About Drake

64, Male, Married. Vietnam 67 - 68

Barclays gags Guardian over tax

Barclays gags Guardian over tax

Injunction forces news website to remove seven leaked memos showing how bank avoided hundreds of millions of pounds in tax

Staff reporter
guardian.co.uk,
Tuesday 17 March 2009 05.05 EDT

Barclays Bank obtained a court order early today banning the Guardianfrom publishing documents which showed how the bank set up companies to avoid hundreds of millions of pounds in tax.

The gagging order was granted by Mr Justice Ouseley after Barclays complained about seven documents on the Guardian’s website which had been leaked to the Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader, Vince Cable.

The internal Barclays memos – leaked by a Barclays whistleblower – showed executives from SCM, Barclays’s structured capital markets division, seeking approval for a 2007 plan to sink more than $16bn (£11.4bn) into US loans.

Tax benefits were to be generated by an elaborate circuit of Cayman islands companies, US partnerships and Luxembourg subsidiaries.

The documents had been leaked to Cable by a former employee of the bank, who wrote a long account of how the bank works.

The anonymous whistleblower wrote to Cable: “The last year has seen the global taxpayer having to rescue the global financial system. The taxpayer has already had a gun put to their head and been told to pay up or watch the financial system and life as we know it disappear into a black hole.

“It is a commonly held view that no agency in the US or the UK has the resources or the commitment to challenge SCM. SCM has huge amounts of resources, the best minds rewarded by millions of pounds. Compare this with HMRC [Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs] recently advertising for a tax and accounting expert with the pay at £45,000.

“Through the use of lawyers and client confidentiality SCM regularly circumvents these rules, just one example of why HMRC will never, in its current state, be up to the job of combating this business.”

The Guardian’s decision to publish the documents came on a day when the chancellor, Alistair Darling, told parliament he had asked HMRC to publish shortly a draft code of practice on taxation for banks “so that banks will comply not just with the letter of the law but the spirit of the law”.

Barclays’s lawyers, Freshfields, worked into the early hours to force the Guardian to remove the documents from the website. They argued that the documents were the property of Barclays and could only have been leaked by someone who acquired them wrongfully and in breach of confidentiality agreements.

The Guardian’s solicitor, Geraldine Proudler, was woken by the judge at 2am and asked to argue the Guardian’s case by telephone. Around 2.31am, Mr Justice Ouseley issued an order for the documents to be removed from the Guardian’s website.

Cable said it was both “incongruous” and “offensive” that banks that rely on state support should avoid paying tax and therefore be “selling the taxpayer short”. Although the taxpayer has not had to directly support Barclays by taking an equity stake, the bank had relied on the government’s special liquidity scheme to provide funding for loans.

“The banks are able to organise their activities in such a way that they can run rings around the Inland Revenue,” he told the Telegraph. “It serves no other purpose than to reduce tax. The fundamental point is that it is incongruous and offensive that banks which are either directly or indirectly dependent on the government should be systematically finding ways to avoid tax.”

Cable, who passed the documents to HMRC and the Financial Services Authority, told the Sunday Times this week: “The documents suggest a deeply ingrained culture of tax avoidance. The Barclays team looks like the spider at the centre of a highly artificial web of non-transparent transactions through tax havens. Reputable banks don’t turn tax avoidance into a profit machine.”

A Guardian spokesman said this morning that the paper would appeal against the order. “Tax avoidance is a matter of high public and political interest. These documents showed for the first time how major banks set up artificial schemes with the aim of earning hundreds of millions in tax-free money, which is why the Barclays whistleblower leaked them.

“All decisions about tax are taken in secret, hidden from public view. It is not right for a judge to prevent daylight from shining on the few documents ever to have emerged which graphically demonstrate what HMRC is up against.”

AL GORE ADMITS…. SPRAYING 90 MILLION TONS PER DAY OF TOXIC CHEMICALS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE

FROM THE MAN WHO INVENTED THE INTERNET…..

 
He must know more than us average folks do.
 
Here is something he obviously knows about stratospheric aerosol spraying (a.k.a.) chemtrails that I have not heard up to this point.
 
Listening to Mr. Al Gore(-ithum) or Ellen normally makes me want to change the channel immediately, or puke, however this time he shared information which he must be privy to that disclosed the magnitude of the toxic chemicals which are being dumped into the atmosphere on a DAILY basis.
 
NINETY MILLION tons, PER DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
He acts like it’s terrible that they would spend all that money to pollute the atmosphere and we should unite to put a stop to it. We all know he’s just jealous that money would be better spent to pay his Global Cap and Trade Taxes and cow farts.
 
NINETY MILLION tons, PER DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is a smokin’ gun to the magnitude of what they dumping on us via Chem-trail Aerosol Spraying.
 
You do the math, NINETY MILLION tons, PER DAY  x 365 days x 10+ years = ????????
 
Also, note his comments regarding how this is part of the plan of manipulating the droughts, floods and super storms across the nation.
 
For those who haven’t bothered to pay attention to the skies for the last 10+ years check out the links listed after the Al Gore admission video.
 
For those people you know that believe “ignorance is bliss” tell them not to watch or listen to this information.
 
Best regards,
Ralph
 

Al Gore admits Chemtrails are for blocking the SUN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SrrWXurroWw
 
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
 
Chem-Trailing 101 (pre documentaries below)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tisXSc4sW3A&feature=player_embedded!
 
What in the World are They Spraying?
Why in the World are they Spraying?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEfJO0-cTis

Navy SEAL Extortion 17 EXPOSED – Obama Failures

TrentoVision 5.9.13 – Navy SEAL Extortion 17 EXPOSED – Obama Failures

Published on May 9, 2013

May 9, Thursday 10:00 AM, National Press Club, Washington, DC:

Watch these Navy SEAL Team VI families and other family members as they reveal the Obama Administrations culpability in death of their sons in the fatal helicopter crash in Afghanistan following the successful raid on bin Laden’s compound. This is a powerful and riveting briefing thatincluded some of America’s most significant military leaders.

Europe Criminalizes Almost All Seeds And Plants

Europe Criminalizes Almost All Seeds And Plants Unless Government Registered

seeds

AUTHOR Bookworm

Here in America, we thought New York mayor Michael Bloomberg was bad when he tried to criminalize large-sized (“Big Gulp”) sodas. It turns out that, when it comes to a socialist government exerting control over people’s food choices, he was a rank amateur. The European Union, which just last week proposed taking control of people’s refrigerators, is now pushing a law that would make it illegal to grow any seed or plant that hasn’t been official registered (at no small expense) with a newly created “EU Plant Variety Agency.”

The law is so broad in scope that any home gardener who experiments with seeds or plant grafts will suddenly be a criminal. It mandates that everything that goes to market, even if it’s from a small-scale home gardener, must get registered: “The varieties, in order to be made available on the market throughout the Union, shall be included in a national register or in the Union register via direct application procedure to the CVPO.”

In addition, the gardener seeking to sell his produce must pay a fee and get sucked into the EU bureaucracy just for the privilege of growing nature’s bounding (including all heirloom varieties) and then selling it to people who like food fresh from a garden, but who don’t want to sell it themselves:

The competent authorities and the CPVO should charge fees for the processing of
applications, the formal and technical examinations including audits, variety denomination, and the maintenance of the varieties for each year for the duration of the registration.

Gardeners throughout Europe are appropriately horrified. Ben Gabel, a vegetable breeder and director ofThe Real Seed Catalogue, told NaturalNews.com that “This law will immediately stop the professional development of vegetable varieties for home gardeners, organic growers, and small-scale market farmers.”

According to Gabel, the rules make no sense for home or small scale gardeners. “Home gardeners have really different needs – for example they grow by hand, not machine, and can’t or don’t want to use such powerful chemical sprays,” Gabel said. “There’s no way to register the varieties suitable for home use as they don’t meet the strict criteria of the Plant Variety Agency, which is only concerned about approving the sort of seed used by industrial farmers.”

Home gardeners know that the law is ostensibly intended to target only commercial growers but, because it has no limiting language, they’re afraid that they are going to be staring down a very slippery slope if the law goes into effect. Even commercial growers, with departments full of lawyers, are going to have problems with the law, since it is written in the opaque, muddled, turgid language that is the specialty of bureaucrats around the world, but that the European Union has brought to a new peak of Orwellian nastiness.

An organic seed supplier in England, RealSeeds.co.uk has sent out a warning about the nightmare ahead for anyone trying to understand, let alone comply with, the proposed law:

You cannot just read the first 5 pages or so that are an ‘executive summary’, and think you know what this law is about. The executive summary is NOT what will become the law. It is the actual Articles themselves that become law, the Summary has no legal standing and is just tacked on as an aid to the public and legislators, it is supposed to give background information and set the proposed legislation in context so people know what is going on and why.

The problem with this law has always been that the Summary says lots of nice fluffy things about preserving biodiversity, simplifying legislation, making things easier etc – things we all would love – but the Articles of the law actually do completely the opposite. And the Summary is not what becomes the law.

For example, the Summary of drafts 1, 2 & 3 talked about making things easier for ‘Amateur’ varieties. But the entire class of Amateur vegetables – which we have spent 5 years working with DEFRA to register – was actually abolished entirely in the Articles right from the start. Yet the Summary , and press releases based on it, still talked about how it will help preserve Amateur varieties! The Summary is completely bogus. Do not base your views of the law on it!

So, be warned. By all means, read it yourself. But you have the ignore the Summary as that is not the Law, and does not reflect what is in the Law.

Europeans are terrified of genetically modified seeds, especially those that come from agri-biz giants such as Monsanto or DuPont. Everyone knows that the EU’s primary purpose is to put those companies out of business by refusing to allow them to register their seeds. Once they have succeeded in criminalizing a business model that feeds more people in the world than at any other time in history, the bureaucracy, to justify its continued existence, will have to find new targets and it will put the small farmers in its crosshairs. There’s also an alternative scenario, which says that the EU has sold itself to the giant agri-business companies and is now trying to get small farmers out of the market, so that the big corporations will face less competition and control world food supply.

No matter how one looks at this, it’s a terrible idea. Whether it punishes small farmers or big ones, the end result will be less food and fewer food choices for people around the world.

Neil Keenan’s Original Lawsuit – in .pdf form

Posted on May 9, 2013 by 

SCHEDULE A – DEFENDANTS
[Don't ask me about the missing numbers, 5 & 10. I don't have an answer. ~J]

  1. DANIELE DAL BOSCO
  2. THE OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL TREASURY CONTROL
  3. RAY C. DAM, individually, and as President of OITC
  4. DAVID A. SALE, individually, and as Deputy Chief of the Council for the Cabinet of OITC
  1. THE UNITED NATIONS
  2. BAN KI-moon, individually, and as Secretary General of the UN
  3. H.E. Ambassador CESARE MARIA RAGAGLINI, Individually, and as Permanent Representative of the Italian Mission to the UN in New York
  4. H.E. Ambassador LAURA MlRACHIAN, Individually, and as Permanent Representative of the Italian Mission to the UN in Geneva
  1. ITALIAN REPUBLIC
  2. ITALIAN FINANCIAL POLICE
  3. SILVIO BERLUSCONI, Former Prime Minister of Italy
  4. THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
  5. WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM U.S.A., INC.
  6. GIANCARLO BRUNO, individually, and as Head of the Banking Industry of WEF

NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

1. This is a civil claim arising out ofthe concerted, knowing, malicious scheme and international conspiracy engaged in by the Defendants for the designed purpose of defrauding plaintiff KEENAN, the designated Agent of his Principal, the “Dragon Family,” for the express purpose of expropriating, stealing and converting certain negotiable financial instruments lawfully owned by the Dragon Family and entrusted to KEENAN in early 2009. These assets (hereinafter referred to as the “Dragon Family Financial Instruments” or the “DFFI”) had been intended for participation in select, registered and authorized Private Placement Investment Programs(or”PPPs”)for the benefit of a wide range of global humanitarian purposes. At the time of the criminal and deceitful acts of the Defendants, the approximate face value of the stolen DFFI was One Hundred Forty-Five and One Half Billion ($145,500,000,000.00) United States Dollars with an approximate accrued interest value of One Trillion ($1,000,000,000,000.00) United States Dollars.

2. The stolen DFFI, which had been entrusted to KEENAN in early 2009 by the Dragon Family, are comprised of the following: (continued in the .pdf document. ~Jean)

Click Here to continue reading the Keenan_complaint_11-23-2011_SDNY

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE: OITC ZOMBIE BACK FROM THE DEAD…BUT NOT FOR LONG

Posted on May 9, 2013by 

May 8, 2013

by Michael Henry Dunn

David P. Crayford recently attempted to resuscitate the fraudulent entity which calls itself the Office of International Treasury Control (OITC) via an unsubstantiated smear attack on Neil Keenan, posted on Rumor Mill News. We will make quick work of this grossly inaccurate article, in order to set the record straight as Mr. Keenan continues his work with the Global Collateral Accounts.

CHARGE: Crayford states that Neil Keenan was “caught (Red Handed) in criminal activities when he was carrying in his possession a wad of Financial Certificates, Bonds, Notes in 2010 / 2011 and he saw what happened to his accomplices, Yamaguchi and Watanabe…”

REALITY: At no time was Mr. Keenan “caught” in any criminal activity, and Crayford provides no evidence whatsoever to back this assertion.  Yamaguchi and Watanabe were the legitimate holders of the notes seized at Chiasso.  These notes disappeared, and no record of a charge or a court case remains.  The bonds were to all appearances simply stolen by the Italian Financial Police, for laundering through cabal entities such as Silvio Berlusconi and the U.N. who are accordingly defendants in Mr. Keenan’s lawsuit (along with the OITC itself).  Crayford fails to state what “criminal activity” Keenan was engaged in, cites no law, and provides no evidence of illegal activity.

CHARGE: Crayford states “instead of crossing the border from Italy to Switzerland, as his accomplices did and found themselves in handcuffs, Keenan literally dumped these into the hands of Daniele Dal Bosco in Italy, who then contacted us to establish what these Certificates, Bonds and Notes were all about.

REALITY: At no time did Mr. Keenan “dump” the bonds to Dal Bosco.  A custodianship agreement had been signed by Dal Bosco acknowledging the legitimacy of the bonds, of the Dragon Family’s claim to them, and his sworn promise to be custodian – and custodian only – of the bonds, and to deliver them when and where required by Keenan.  As we all know, he subsequently stole the bonds, and attempted to launder them through Crayford’s bogus organization. If Crayford had performed the simple due diligence of reading Mr. Keenan’s lawsuit, he would have read the following document in which Dal Bosco officially agreeing to a custodianship agreement for the bonds, as seen below:

(from Keenan Lawsuit) Item 75.  In early September 2009, KEENAN offered such custodianship to DAL BOSCO, and by electronic transmission dated September 2, 2009, DAL BOSCO acknowledged to KEENAN his “ACCEPTANCE” as “Custodian of the Dragon Family Financial Instruments” and noted, among other things:

(a) I can assure you that you will never regret making this decision. You are aware of the fact I am well trusted and a financial advisor within the Vatican and Mason circles and would never jeopardize my position with them for anything.

(b) My word is my bond and my word is Gold.

(c) I will be waiting for your Zurich arrival so that we can do great  things for the world. I understand clearly that I am not to discuss these bonds with anyone outside the immediate circle and my privacy is integral to the success of many nations.

(d) I further understand you are the authorized representative and Power of Attorney for said bonds and I will entrust them believe me as though it was my life depending on it. Therefore I humbly accept the custodianship of said Bonds in which I am only “to return them to either you or Mr. Yamaguchi. Not any other!

(e) Although electronic this email is to be considered my legal binding acceptance of the following bonds:

1. 250 Federal Reserve Notes, Series 1934, Numbers D45184101 A to 45184350 A, with each having a face value of 500 Million USD each totaling 125 Billion USD.

2. Japanese Bonas 57 Series numbers 1306 and 1310 with a value of 19 Billion USD including the interest.

3. 1 Kennedy Bond with a value of $1 Billion USD.

(f) Will be ready when called upon to deliver said notes to you.

Thank you once again for your kindness.

Yours truly, Daniele Dal Bosco

Italian Passport C 165124

CHARGE:  Crayford states: “since then Keenan has, unjustifiably and unwarranted, done nothing but lambasted Daniele Dal Bosco and all others who have contradicted him, calling them criminals and part of the cabal, etc, etc, etc. A real case of the Pot calling the Kettle Black.”

REALITY:  As Crayford well knows, Mr. Keenan acted legally and responsibly in response to Dal Bosco’s theft.  As trustee for the Dragon Family, he was charged with recovering the bonds, and so he immediately instituted legal action against Dal Bosco, the OITC, the Italian Financial Police, the World Economic Forum, Giancarlo Bruno, Ban Ki Moon, the United Nations, and other cabal entities approached by Dal Bosco in his attempt to launder the bonds.  Dal Bosco’s violation of his custodianship, and subsequent theft are thoroughly documented, as is the bogus nature of the OITC (as may be seen at the Wikipedia article which states that OITC is a “seemingly elaborate fraudulent organization which claims to be associated with the United Nations.”)

CHARGE: Crayford states: “If Keenan knew anything at all he would know the simplest of things like the laws which are in place around the world that prohibit a person from carrying such Certificates, Bonds, Notes,  etc, even copies of same. These laws restrict such movements of such Certificates, Bonds, and Notes, etc, to Bank Couriers, and Bonded Couriers…”

REALITY:  Again, Crayford has apparently not done the simplest due diligence in this matter. Mr. Keenan had been legally entrusted with authenticated bonds by the Dragon Family, and accordingly familiarized himself with the legal parameters governing his possession of such bonds.  The reason that no charges were filed against Yamaguchi and Watanabe is that their possession of the bonds was entirely legal.  This fact was noted in the Japanese press at the time, and is cited in the Keenan lawsuit as follows:

(from Keenan Lawsuit) Item 64. As reported by the Japanese and Italian press at the time, upon arriving at Chiasso, Yamaguchi and Watanabe were detained by the ITALIAN FINANCIAL POLICE after attempting to enter Switzerland with “undeclared United States Treasury Bonds concealed in a suitcase with a false bottom.” The Japanese Consulate General in Milan confirmed that the “detention” had taken place while trying to confirm the men’s identities. Eventually, neither Yamaguchi nor Watanabe were arrested, although their computer and eight telephones were also confiscated. Reportedly, Yamaguchi advised the authorities that the pair was in possession of valid historic bonds and that a mistake was being made. According to Japanese press reports, Yamaguchi and Watanabe were released as they “broke no laws.” Upon information and belief, it was Yamaguchi’ s position that since there had been no verification in accordance with the protocol required by the Federal Reserve system, and no negotiation with the Federal Reserve concerning the actual value of the financial instruments he was carrying, no laws had been broken

Although an Italian newspaper subsequently reported that the men had been found guilty of carrying fraudulent notes and sentenced to prison, no such charge or case exists within the records of the Italian government:

CHARGE:  Crayford states: “Keenan is the one engaging in Fraud against the Global Accounts (Collateral Accounts) as well as the OPPT, yet he has the audacity to say he watching out for further fraud…”

REALITY:  Crayford gives no evidence whatsoever for this serious allegation.  His article consists almost entirely of unsubstantiated smears.

CHARGE:  Crayford states: “The job of mopping up and exposing the hidden agenda of the Global Accounts should be left to us (The OITC) as the party best experienced and knowledgeable of the Global Accounts, along with the newly appointed International Treasury Controller, the real Legal Heir, Owner, and Sole Arbiter of the Accounts, who is attending to this matter on a constant basis with the Hierarchy….”

REALITY:  The OITC’s fraudulent nature has been repeatedly exposed to the world, as demonstrated at the Wikipedia link.  If Mr. Crayford seriously expects to convince his readers of the reality of the “newly appointed International Treasury Controller,” or of the mysterious “Heirarchy,” then it would behoove him to tell us just who the hell they are.  This, of course, he fails to do, protesting that it’s a really big secret that he can’t let out just yet.  Forgive us for our skepticism, and for suspecting that this sounds like a desperate cabal attempt to prop up some entity that might give them a shot at regaining control of the Accounts.

CHARGE:  Crayford states: “You (Keenan) are using your belief, your lies, to subvert people in Indonesia into believing you and your actions are genuine and legal, whereas they are the complete opposite to legal and you, Keenan, are the instigator of this fraud because you hold no rights whatsoever and you have, and are, attempting to use your misguided beliefs and lies to obtain rights from third parties of which they hold no rights either even though they may be “Elders” appointed by former President Soekarno to act as “Holders / Custodians” of the assets deposited in Indonesia. The Rights legally belong to the International Treasury Controller who is the Legal Heir, Owner and Sole Arbiter under Legal Decadency 1088 dated 20th January 1995, which superseded all other previous agreements. NOTE: ALL OTHER PREVIOUS AGREEMENTS (if any) referenced to the control, ownership and arbitrary rights of the Global Accounts (Collateral Accounts).

REALITY:  At no time has Neil Keenan claimed a legal right to represent or manage the accounts.  He has responded to the requests of various stakeholders – meaning those with a vested interest in the Global Accounts, including the Elders, the Depositors, and the nations – who saw that his actions in pursuit of the bonds opened an opportunity to finally put an end to the historic fraud practiced upon the Accounts by the entities which Mr. Crayford claims to represent (i.e., cabal-controlled organizations and persons such as the OITC, the UN, the World Economic Forum, the Italian Government, etc.).  The reason that he is now seen worldwide as a key factor in the responsible management of the Accounts is that he has the backing of the stakeholders, and has demonstrated his integrity, having refused bribes of astronomical sums to walk away.  Agreements are being drawn up.  In the meantime, Mr. Keenan sees it as his duty to expose further persons or entities attempting to defraud the Accounts (such as the OPPT, UN Swissindo, and the OITC).

CHARGE: Crayford states: “these stakeholders hold no authority to be able to pass such authority to Keenan. The authority is held by the Committee of the Hierarchy and the Chairman of the Hierarchy as Holder(s) of the Alfa – Omega Ring (Solomon’s Ring). Therefore if these stakeholders are willy-nillying giving out authority to someone who thinks he knows, or all and sundry, then they too are acting fraudulently. “

REALITY:  Here Crayford assumes the bald-faced brazen balderdash that is the indispensable ingredient of a successful con: make up cool-sounding stuff, and repeat it over and over until people start to believe it.  “Solomon’s Ring”?  You’ve got to be kidding me.  Great.  Introduce us to the “Heirarchy,” tell us who “the Controller” is, and show us the Ring, my precious, or we’ll take you straight to Mount Doom and fry your butt in lava.

CHARGE: Crayford states: “…because the American Courts hold no authority or Jurisdiction over the ITC / OITC. In fact it is the other way around. The ITC / OITC hold more jurisdiction over America than what the people actually know about, and could, and possibly will, turn America and its allies in this Fraud and Theft, upside down and inside out in due course. Then watch the sparks fly because we at the OITC do not make promises and then break them. Watch out Keenan, Drake and the OPPT, because that includes YOU as well.

REALITY:  This string of unsubstantiated, ill-informed, distorted allegations will not be causing even the teensiest anxiety to Neil Keenan, Drake Bailey, or to the other genuine principals working towards a responsible reset of the global financial system and a rebirth of freedom.  Until Mr. Crayford has something substantial to say, backed by evidence and documentation, or until he’s willing to tell us who the mysterious new “Controller” is, or just who the “Heirarchy” is and why we should trust them, when he’s willing to refute the pile of evidence indicating that OITC is a total sham…well, until such time, we will continue with our work, and suggest that he find some himself.

CONCLUSION:  A logical question arises: if OITC is so patently obvious a fraud, then what is Mr. Crayford intending to accomplish with this clumsy attempt to prop up the organization’s credibility via an attack on Neil Keenan?

A highly placed source in international banking informed Keenan (in this writer’s hearing) that the incidence of fraudulent activity around the Global Accounts has skyrocketed in recent months, as it became apparent that the Accounts would finally be audited and set in order by Mr. Keenan.  This source likened the phenomenon to rats….not rats fleeing a sinking ship, but rather a pack of rodents gnawing on the last few bits of meat clinging to a bone that is about to be taken away.

These frauds are necessarily based on getting someone to believe that you and your organization have some claim on or access to the Accounts, via family connections, or a bogus organization, or because (as with Adnan Sakhli) you had a lengthy affair with the widow of an exiled former dictator who stole a lot of gold (believe it or not, some people actually buy that one).

Once you have established your bogus bona fides, you then make the pitch for funding for your lawsuit, or you trade unusable Federal Reserve Notes for cash, or (as with the case of OITC) you sell phony diplomatic immunity for $20,000 each, via a non-existent affiliation with the United Nations.  All these gambits become unworkable if word starts to get around that a genuine system of responsible management is being put in place.  So what is left to do at that point, if you don’t want your livelihood taken away?  Attack the new manager, of course, no matter how clumsily, no matter if you provide no evidence – just throw all the dirt you can, and hope that some sticks long enough for you to dupe a few more gullible marks.

Yes, OITC claims diplomatic immunity, and innocent people are reportedly landing in jail after attempting to use these bogus passports, purchased at $20k each.  Where was OITC’s immunity when the Chairman, Ray Dam, spent nine months in a Cambodian prison? Where was the OITC’s UN affiliation and vast wealth when people flew to the address in Thailand to find no offices there?

Contrast this to the case of Mr. Keenan, who spent millions of dollars of his own funds on a lawsuit to recover notes that had been entrusted to him, and who has pursued the truth behind the Global Collateral Accounts despite massive bribe offers, death threats, and assassination attempts.  Yes, he is a businessman, and intends to ultimately be fairly compensated for his management of the assets, if that likelihood is confirmed by impending agreements.  But when we compare his actions to that of people such as Ray Dam, David Sale, and Mr. Crayford, the old saying from scripture proves true again…”by their fruits shall you know them.”

Michael Henry Dunn

Texas House Gives Final Approval to Impressive Number of Pro-Second Amendment Bills

1-800-392-8683 | www.nraila.com

Texas House Gives Final Approval to Impressive Number of Pro-Second Amendment Bills

Gun owners’ patience and persistence was rewarded on Saturday and yesterday, as the Texas House of Representatives led by Speaker Joe Straus (R-San Antonio) gave approval to a wide range of pro-gun legislation while the NRA Annual Meeting was underway in Houston.  Most of these bills passed overwhelmingly, in spite of repeated attempts by anti-gun members of the minority party to kill some of these measures by raising parliamentary “points of order” against them for alleged violations of House rules.  Many violations are procedural in nature, involving the committee process and committee reports. Thanks to the meticulous work of House Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee Chairman Joe Pickett (D-El Paso) and his staff, none of the points were sustained, and debate and votes on the bills were allowed to proceed on the House floor.
Thank you to the hard-working sponsors of these measures and their dedicated staff for getting them passed in the state House of Representatives
Senate Bill 299 / House Bill 1304 by state Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) and state Representative Kenneth Sheets (R-Dallas) protects against charges of unlawful carry for the inadvertent or accidental display of a handgun by a Concealed Handgun Licensee.  SB 299 was taken up in lieu of HB 1304 on the House floor and will be the bill that goes to Governor Perry for his signature.
Senate Bill 864 / House Bill 47 by state Senator Donna Campbell (R-New Braunfels) and state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Van) reduces the minimum number of required classroom training hours for original and renewal Concealed Handgun Licenses from 10-15 to 4-6.  This change would make it far more convenient for CHL applicants to obtain a license to carry and exercise their right to self-defense.  SB 864 was taken up in lieu of HB 47 on the House floor and will be the bill that goes to Governor Rick Perry for his signature.
House Bill 508 by state Representative Ryan Guillen (D-Rio Grande City) imposes civil fines on state agencies, cities or counties which improperly post 30.06 signs prohibiting Concealed Handgun Licensees from property which is not off-limits to them under the Texas Penal Code.  It also gives the Texas Attorney General or local district attorney the ability to sue to collect the civil penalties if the offending agency or political subdivision fails to remove the sign after having been notified of a violation.  This bill now moves to the Senate for consideration – please contact your state Senator and urge him or her to support HB 508!  Contact information can be found by clicking here.
House Bill 972 by state Representative Allen Fletcher (R-Cypress) and state Senator Brian Birdwell (R-Granbury) eliminates the criminal prohibition on the possession of firearms on public and private college campuses for Texas Concealed Handgun Licensees.  As passed in the House, schools may adopt administrative rules and regulations restricting licensees in campus buildings, but only after consulting annually with campus law enforcement, faculty, staff and students.  HB 972 also now contains language from SB 1907 by Senator Glenn Hegar prohibiting public and private institutions of higher education from adopting or enforcing policies banning students who are CHLs from transporting and storing handguns and ammunition in their privately-owned motor vehicles while driving through or parking on campus.  This bill now moves to the Senate for consideration – please contact your state Senator and urge him or her to support HB 972!  Contact information can be found by clicking here.
The following pro-Second Amendment bills were also passed in the Texas House and now go to the state Senate:
House Bill 48 by state Representative Dan Flynn (R-Canton) and Senator Donna Campbell (R-San Antonio) streamlines the process for renewal of a Concealed Handgun License by eliminating the continuing education course and handgun proficiency demonstration requirements.  Applicants would still be required to renew their licenses every five years, but they would be provided with an informational form regarding pertinent firearms and deadly force laws, which would have to be signed and turned in with the CHL renewal application.
House Bill 485 by state Representative Sarah Davis (R-Houston) reduces the fees for original or renewal Concealed Handgun Licenses charged to veterans who are honorably discharged after at least one year of military service, as well as reserve and part-time peace officers, to $25 – from $70 to $35, respectively.  A House floor amendment was adopted which included two new categories of individuals to whom this new discount would apply: TDCJ correctional officers and members of the Texas Military Forces.
House Bill 698 by state Representative Drew Springer (R-Muenster) and state Senator Craig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) requires DPS to establish procedures for the submission of fingerprints by CHL applicants who live in counties with populations of less than 46,000 and do not live within 25 miles of a designated facility capable of processing them digitally or electronically.  Availability of such services continues to be a problem in rural areas, as the state only contracts with one company.
House Bill 1076 by state Representative Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands) would prohibit any state agency or agency employee from enforcing a federal statute or regulation on firearms or firearm accessories that does not exist under Texas state law.  Any agency that violated this prohibition would not be allowed to receive state grant funds for the fiscal year in which a violation occurred.
House Bill 1349 by state Representative Lyle Larson (R-San Antonio) prohibits DPS from requesting or requiring that an applicant’s social security number be disclosed during the process of obtaining an original or renewal Concealed Handgun License.

House Bill 1421 by state Representative Charles Perry (R-Lubbock) and SenatorCraig Estes (R-Wichita Falls) would allow firearms seized by law enforcement in connection with a crime, and not returnable to a rightful owner, to be sold at a public sale to federal firearms licensed dealers rather than be destroyed.

Reverend Kevin Annett is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

For Immediate Release:

Kevin Annett is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

May 8 – New York City

Reverend Kevin Annett has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a group of American and Canadian academicians, it was learned today. Annett is currently on an extended speaking tour in Holland, France, Italy and other countries.

Reverend Annett has made history since 1996 with his meticulous exposure of church and state sponsored Genocide of indigenous children in Canada’s Indian residential school system. Annett produced the first documented evidence of massive deaths in the schools and helped force official recognition and an apology from the government of Canada in 2008.

Reverend Annett has been honored and adopted by aboriginal nations in Canada over the past fifteen years and has helped immeasureable numbers of residential school survivors at a great personal cost, in recognition of which he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a group of North American scholars.

“Without Kevin Annett there would have been no healing and no justice for any of us survivors of this Genocide. He has put us on the map” stated Ojibway Nation elder Louis Daniels in October of 2004 when he adopted Annett into his tribe and gave him the name Eagle Strong Voice.

The Nobel Committee in Oslo – which may itself name candidates – does not reveal nominees or those who endorse them for a period of 50 years, nor does it offer comment, although contenders are sometimes named or speculated over by the media and other sources.

Rev. Annett presently serves as the Field Secretary for the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State. A complete interview with him will be posted shortly at www.itccs.org

ITCCS: Child Sacrifice and Trafficking in Holland

Child Sacrifice and Trafficking in Holland, and Abroad: An Eyewitness Comes Forward and Names her Torturers

An Exclusive Breaking News Report from ITCCS Central Office and its Dutch Affiliates

May 8, 2013: Zwolle, Holland:

A survivor of a high-level ring involving child sacrifice, torture and trafficking went public today in an exclusive disclosure and interview with Freedom Central’s Mel Ve and ITCCS Field Secretary Kevin Annett.

Toos Nijenhuis, a fifty four year old physiotherapist and mother of five from Holland, was tortured, raped and used experimentally from the age of four years old by wealthy and powerful men around the world, including top officials of churches and governments.

And, Nijenhuis claims, these crimes are continuing today, including the ritual sacrifice of children in rural Holland.

On May 7, Ms. Nijenhuis accompanied Kevin Annett, Mel Ve and other investigators to a forested site near to Zwolle where such child murders took place as recently as November, 2010, according to Ms. Nijenhuis.

Among the perpetrators who are named in these crimes and who allegedly assaulted Toos Nijenhuis are Prince Bernhard of Holland, who was the grandfather of the newly-crowned Dutch King Alexander, and a founder of the Bilderberger Group; Catholic Cardinal Bernard Alfrink of Utrecht, and members of the British Royal Family.

These assaults occurred in Holland, Scotland, and a military experimental base in Melbourne, Australia, where Toos was subjected to what appears to be pain threshold and behaviour modification experiments. She also witnessed the torture and murder of other children.

Key excerpts from the interview and statement of Toos Nijenhuis are found in this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyrPEu7nk1Q

In response to Toos Nijenhuis’ horrific revelations, a Dutch-based group was formed on May 7 in Zwolle to investigate and prosecute child traffickers and ritual child sacrifice.

In conjunction with Ms. Nijenhuis, Freedom Central, the ITCCS and others, this new group will launch a Common Law Court case into these crimes during the coming year. Key alleged perpetrators will be publicly named and issued a Summons to appear before the Court.

Stay tuned for more information on this campaign at www.freedomcentral.info , www.itccs.org and the Tribunal’s international language website:http://www.kevinannettinternational.blogspot.fr .